It's really ironic: members in the
church of Christ are often accused of not believing in the blood of
Jesus, while those who make this accusation might observe the Lord's
supper only one to four times a year.
As Christians, we realize the need to
remember that precious blood by which the atonement was made. Without
the Lord's life-saving sacrifice, sinful man would remain in a lost and
hopeless condition, heading inevitably to an eternal separation from God
Himself.
But now through Jesus Christ and by our
faith and obedience, we can contact the blood of the Lord and enjoy the
benefits of having our sins washed away and the beginning of a new life
in the Christ. Actually, the church itself is the ``saved''; and the
``saved'' are simply those who have been ``bought by the blood'' of the
Savior.
This lesson has been designed to show
that the Christian should take of the Lord's supper every first day of
the week in order to remember the death of Jesus and be pleasing to God.
Acts 20:7
is the only passage that specifies the first day of the week as being
the day in which early Christians met to partake of the communion, but
this one passage is enough to suffice.
Let us again consider the comments of a
few highly regarded men who represent different denominational
backgrounds, as to their remarks on
Acts 20:7
and the early church's weekly observance of the Lord's supper. This will
clearly establish that the weekly participation in the Lord's supper is
not just an ``unusual doctrine'' only accepted by those in the ``church
of Christ.'' (Let us also remember, however, that the quotes of men are
never to be the basis for our beliefs in religious matters; but only
that which is from God Himself.)
Adam Clarke: ''...the Lord's day...in
which they commemorated the resurrection of our Lord...'to break
bread'...intimating, by this, that they were accustomed to receive the
holy sacrament on each Lord's day...''
Albert Barnes: ```to break bread.'
Evidently to celebrate the Lord's supper. It is probably that the
apostles and early Christians celebrated the Lord's supper on every
Lord's day.''
Pulpit Commentary: ```to break bread.'
This is also an important example of weekly communion as the practice of
the first Christians...it is impossible not to conclude that the
breaking of bread in the celebration of the Lord's Supper is an
essential part of the holy sacrament, which man may not for any specious
reasons omit....''
Matthew Henry: ``They `came together to
break bread,' that is, to celebrate the ordinance of the Lord's supper,
that one instituted sign of breaking the bread being put for all the
rest...In the primitive times it was the custom of many churches to
receive the Lord's supper every Lord's day....''
What does the Bible say? In
Acts 2:42,
mention is made that the early Christians ``continued steadfastly''
(``were continually devoting themselves,'' NAS) in the Lord's Supper. If
I told you that I continued steadfastly in doing my dishes; but, in
actuality, I washed them only four times a year; you probably would not
consider this being ``steadfast.''
1 Corinthians
11:20-22,33, 34 also indicates
the frequent observance of the Lord's supper. It reads: ``Therefore when
you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord's Supper, for in your
eating each one takes his own supper first; and one is hungry and
another is drunk. What! Do you not have houses in which to eat and
drink? Or do you despise the church of God, and shame those who have
nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you? In this I will not
praise you...So then, my brethren, when you come together to eat, wait
for one another. If anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, so that you
may not come together for judgment....'' The inference is that when they
met it was to take of the Lord's supper, which shows it was to be
observed quite often; but, unfortunately, they had profaned it by
turning it into a common meal -- for this, Paul reprimands them.
In realizing the seriousness of this
observance (1
Cor 11:27-30), how could one
assume that God would allow His children to become lackadaisical with
it? to overlook it? or simply minimize it by partaking of it so seldom?
Notice where the emphasis is placed in
Acts 20:7:
``And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together
to break bread, Paul preached unto them....'' Commenting on this,
Coffman declares: ``This emphatically states the purpose of Christian
assemblies on Sundays throughout history, that purpose being for the
observance of the Lord's supper...Even the address of so distinguished
an apostle as Paul took second billing on that occasion, the primary
purpose having been to observe the Lord's supper...The Christians, from
earliest times, had the habit of meeting for the Lord's supper on `a
fixed day,' and
Acts 20:7
identifies that day as `the first day
of the week,' Sunday.''
Sunday is a ``special'' day to the
Christian. Though it is true that every day is a day in which one should
serve God, Sunday has its special forms of worship. Not only the
communion, but also the contribution is to be observed on this day.
1 Corinthians
16:2 reads, ``Upon the first day
of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath
prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come.'' Seldom will
one hear any preacher object to the weekly offering of the saints.
Actually, many denominations today practice more collections than the
Bible authorizes; but without the death of Christ there could not even
be any offering from the ``saints.''
The communion is a memorial of Jesus
Christ; which has not only been instituted by Him, but also made
possible by His very death. As the Lord was quoted concerning this
supper in 1
Cor. 11:18, ''...do this in
remembrance of Me.''
Early Christians shared the Lord's
Supper every Lord's day. May it be our desire to emulate them in that
which we believe and practice. Though some things have ceased, the
observance of the Lord's Supper has not; and it is to continue until
Jesus Christ returns
(1 Cor. 11:26).