In more recent years some have responded in this
way with increasing frequency to our insistence upon adherence to
the Scriptural pattern: “Well, it’s not a salvation issue.” It
might be a matter of the organization of the local church, the use
of women in roles of leadership, or the use of instrumental music
which they relegate to the area of the unimportant, the
non-essential, or matters about which we can differ and still please
God. The blinding pace of change noted among some in regard to
such issues convinces us that some are truly headed to a stance
where nothing will be viewed as a salvation issue except some
general belief in God or Christ. In recent weeks this writer
learned from a mutual friend about a former brother in the Lord who
had gone so far in his departure that he was meeting with the
Episcopalians; when confronted by a faithful disciple about his
vacillation, he insisted that the Episcopalians would be saved
because “they believe in God.” He obviously had gone this far
because he now thinks that all of the issues formerly separating him
from his eventual Episcopal brothers are not matters of salvation.
Though they might not agree on all of these issues, they are matters
of indifference to all of them. I wonder whether he thinks the
appointment of a practicing sodomite as one of their bishops is such
an issue. It would be interesting to know, would it not? It so
happens that the particular Episcopal congregation which he attends
has a female rector/priest. I also wonder how he views this issue,
in view of his once steadfast insistence upon such matters. In his
years of weakening and departing, he once said concerning Scriptural
teaching on the issue of instrumental music, “It’s truth for you but
it’s not truth not for them,” as if truth is individually and
existentially determined by each one’s own experiences. Imagine
this kind of language being spoken by one of the Lord’s apostles or
first-century preachers, in view of their insistence on hearing
Christ, obeying Him, and not even thinking beyond what is written
(Mt. 17:5; 1 Jn. 4:6; Heb. 5:9; 1 Cor. 4:6).
It is certainly relevant for us to consider this
matter from a Biblical perspective. The relevance is made even
more pertinent by our learning that prominent ones among our more
liberal brethren have spoken to this effect and by the statement of
an elder in a conservative church that the use of the church
treasury is a minor matter. I wonder whether many whom we know
might also have such feelings which they have thus far silenced.
There is probably a greater need for this study than we have
thought. My friends, if God is God, if the Bible is His Word, if
truth and error are distinct from each other, if right is right and
wrong is wrong, and if each shall face Christ in judgment, then we
dare not permit ourselves to drift into such unbelief without the
clarion warnings of God’s Word.
Who/What
Determines This?
To whom has the Lord delegated such a role? Who
among men has the wisdom of Deity to speak for God on such
matters? Is revelation still operating in certain ones so they can
speak for God? The Lord has taught us that man’s thoughts and ways
are not His and man cannot guide his own steps (Isa. 55:8-9; Jer,
10:23). It is human arrogance to speak thus for the Lord—an
arrogance that manifests major disdain for what God has spoken.
O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and
the knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his
ways past tracing out!
For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who
hath been his counsellor?
or who hath first given to him, and it shall be
recompensed unto him again?
For of him, and through him, and unto him, are
all things. To him (be) the glory for ever. Amen (Rom 11:33-36,
ASV).
When human beings become as wise as God, they
will then be qualified to serve as His advisors in the expectation
that He will have to hear them. Until they have advanced that far
up the ladder, they will have to be content to listen to Him or, in
the words of Habakkuk to a similarly arrogant people of his time,
“keep silence before Him” (2:20). We need to learn to be
quiet and hear Him! That lesson is often impressed on children in
a family at an early age, but it seems than some of the more mature
ones in God’s family have forgotten their raisin’ in that they
thought themselves capable of charting their own course. The major
problem now affecting the Episcopal Church in America is the result
of the same attitudes that we here examine among our own; it did not
develop overnight.
Is there really anybody to whom the Lord has
passed this grave responsibility of declaring for Him what is a
salvation issue? Of course not, not even a group of distinguished
scholars who know the language or have thought much about such
matters or been selected by their brethren to serve in this
capacity. Whoever presumes to speak in this fashion must remember
that he, too, will answer to Christ for his lack of faith in Christ
and confidence in His Word (Jn. 12:48). Furthermore, there
is no revealed basis for making such a determination, no question
that must be asked, or no qualities that men can identify as marking
an issue as one necessary or unnecessary to salvation. It is a
task that nobody knows anything about, for God has not instructed us
on this matter. It is in his jurisdiction, not ours. If He makes
a difference in the Day of Judgment, at least He will know what He
is doing and will have the divine right to do it. We don’t know
and need to be quiet before Him (1 Pet. 4:11)!
Any Non-essential
Commands?
A question often asked by gospel preachers in
debating denominationalists, who protested the need to be baptized
to be saved, was “Did God give any non-essential commands?” God
clearly commanded baptism in passages like Acts 2:38 and
10:48. Did He command something not necessary? The same
question applies to the Lord’s commands not to add to His words or
to subtract from them. Is it necessary for us to observe them?
If it is, then we have no right to venture into the arena of
innovation where modern religion delights to operate.
Paul’s Spirit-directed commands that restrict
women from leading roles in the church were not matters culturally
driven and thus unneeded in later cultures. We observe in their
contexts that other factors prompted the Lord to legislate as He did
(1 Cor. 14:34; 1 Tim. 2:12-14). In every matter that has
come before the current “divine counselors” for their official
declaration of wisdom, not one convincing point has been made that
would remove any of the Lord’s commands. They stand as He gave
them—essential to our right standing before Him and to our eternal
salvation. God made no provision for a new group of apostles or
latter-day prophets to bless the world with up-to-date changes.
Old Gospel-Doctrine
Distinction
Once upon a time in the distant past, the wise
ones of that age also thought there is a difference between things
essential and things non-essential. Men like Leroy Garrett and
Carl Ketcherside borrowed from the writing of denominationalists
(who expounded more about the Greek than the English but still
failed to prove their point) to be among the first to speak about
such matters among brethren. They distinguished matters necessary
to becoming a Christian (styled “gospel” by them) from matters
related to growth in Christ (styled “doctrine” by them). Actually
they were making a distinction without a difference, for the Bible
fails to bear out their use of the terms in such fashion as they
alleged. In the New Testament there is really no difference
between the gospel of Christ and the doctrine of Christ.
As this writer thought about the present
situation, he saw a parallel between the old distinction and the new
one. In both cases some matters/issues are seen as necessary to
salvation, while others are seen as unrelated. In the area of the
unrelated/unnecessary issues, they said there can be
unity-in-diversity. One of the major problems attaching itself to
this human distinction was identifying who decides which issues
belong where. It sounds familiar, doesn’t it? In case the reader
has so soon forgotten, he needs to re-read the second section of
this article.
Willing to Take the
Risk?
Are you willing to risk your soul to the
meanderings of human wisdom? “Meanderings” is the proper term to
describe the uncertain wandering course of one refusing to follow
Christ as his guiding star and the Bible as his divinely given
chart. All religious history bears witness to the tendency of man
thus to wander. The sole solution to this tendency is to heed the
Master’s instruction in Matthew 7:13-15:
Enter ye in by the narrow gate: for wide is the
gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many
are they that enter in thereby.
For narrow is the gate, and straitened the way,
that leadeth unto life, and few are they that find it.
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in
sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves.
The gate by which one enters into Christ is
narrow, and the way by which he persists in service to God is
straitened (difficult). It become more difficult when one loses
sight of the truth taught by the Lord and hearkens to the error of
false prophets, people falsely claiming to speak for the Lord. The
principle of respecting (not relaxing) God’s commands, stated under
the Mosaic arrangement by Jesus in Matthew 5:19, also
prefaces the new dispensation under Christ with a similar warning,
which is abundantly stated there as well.
You do not need to meander! You do not need to
shift about on the quicksand of human opinion and speculation!
There is solid ground where you can stand on the revealed truth of
God’s Word! Plant your feet there and refuse to be moved. You
can be that tree planted by the water—fruitful, successful, and
unfading in God’s service (Ps. 1:3).
Bobby L. Graham
24978 Bubba Trail
Athens, AL 35613
256-233-3509
bobbylgraham@pclnet.net