Modern man has lost the
ability to learn and obey God's truth by destroying, for the most part, the
most basic principle on which truth can rest. This is a principle that is
taught in the scriptures
(1 Timothy
6:3-5; 2 Timothy 3:6, 7; 4:1-5; Titus 1:10-13)
as much as it is an
observation made in the real world. The notion that truth exists at all is
rejected by many, - even by some who claim to be Christians. It really seems
to be a part of the breakdown of "rational thinking" more than a
deterioration of "communication" skills.
We are seeing, in our day,
the fruit of subjectivism. Words do not mean anything in these days of
relativism. As a result of this men seem to feel free to construe the words
of others in any way they choose. They expect others to construe their words
to mean what they do not mean in the dictionary. These are two sides of one
coin. The coin of subjectivism.
In "the old days" two men
would approach a question or a problem with something in common. They both
believed that truth existed and they usually believed that the truth they
were seeking could be found. They may have differed widely concerning just
what the truth was, but they both believed it was out there, independent of
what they chose to think. They both argued about the evidence with the
mutual hope of finding the truth. Today, many (if not most) in our culture
have been "educated" (indoctrinated may be more accurate) to believe that
all truth is relative. When we attempt to speak with many of our neighbors
and some of our weak brethren we are simply not on the same page. When we
present evidence for the existence of God, the inspiration of the Bible, the
truthfulness of specific Bible doctrines, and the rightness and wrongness of
certain human actions, we are met with confused looks by those who stand on
no foundation and believe that none exists. While we love those who are thus
adrift without anchor or rudder we are often frustrated in our attempts to
find some "common ground" that will serve as a basis for study and
communication.
This may be a slight
exaggeration, but it seems that when a subjectivist says that, "You are a
dirty, stinking skunk!" he is shocked that you did not construe his words to
mean that, "You are an immaculate, charming sweetheart." In his confused
mind you are responsible for knowing what he meant and that what he meant
was not definite and rigid. You are guilty of unfair judging when you take
his words to mean what we normally use those words to mean. With him,
meanings are flexible rather than fixed. When he says, "You look like a
monkey", he may mean "Apples are fruit." This can be frustrating when we are
on the receiving end of "communication" with a subjectivist, but it is much
more bearable than when we are on the sending end. The subjectivist feels
free to take your words to mean anything he chooses and to tell others what
he has "perceived" you to say. After all, in his mind, words can mean no
more than the ideas that they represent. Since ideas, in his distorted
thinking, can never be objectively fixed, he feels free to impose any
meaning upon them that he chooses.
Over the past several years
we have heard enough straw men quoted by subjectivists to supply the need of
every corn field in the world. While we might as well give up trying to
convince the subjectivists of anything beyond the truth that truth exists,
we need to call them to account for the public statements for the sake of
those who hear their claims. One brother told me this week that, in "45
years of attending the church of Christ, no one ever told [me] what Jesus
has done for us!" When I asked him for the names of the elders, teachers,
and preachers who had neglected their work by not telling him about the
grace, mercy, death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. At first he refused
to give me their names on the grounds that I might be unkind in my dealing
with them. When I promised to be kind and to simply tell them what he had
told me and ask them to study some Bible verses with me he changed his tune
and said, "Well, they did teach me what Jesus has done for us, but they did
not teach me about how the Holy Spirit will directly guide me in my daily
life." Notice the giant difference between the former and latter statements!
And such non-thinkers cannot see the inherent dishonesty of their own words
because truth, to them, is always "fuzzy."
Others tell us that "nothing
can be questioned in churches of Christ." When you ask them what question
they are not permitted to ask, they are at a complete loss. Usually, they
have no response because most preachers and teachers among us are delighted
to have questions to explore from the Bible. A few have said, more or less
in response, "But they claim to have the answers!" And this is the problem
for the subjectivist: "answers!" He hates all things presented by others as
absolute facts. He repudiates the very idea of undeniable truths proceeding
from others. He paints the whole realm of ideas gray so he can select what
he chooses from the whole to turn either black or white at will. He cannot
maneuver well in an environment with fixed boundaries and immovable
obstacles. There he looses his freedom to manipulate, exploit, negotiate,
and orchestrate.
The Bible does not present a
problem for the subjectivist because of
what
it specifically teaches. His problem with the Bible is
that
it specifically teaches. His problem with the church and her teachers is not
really
what
is taught. His problem is
that specific things
are taught as inflexible truth. His battle is not really with the specific
doctrines that he seems to attack as much as it is with the notion that
specific doctrines can be settled once and for all. This leaves him without
arguments in favor of his own ideas and it places him perpetually at odds
with God's people who are always prepared "to contend earnestly for the
faith which was once for all delivered unto the saints"
(Jude 3).